Original Research
A university in a small city: Discovering which sectors benefit
Submitted: 14 June 2017 | Published: 20 November 2017
About the author(s)
David Dyason, School of Economics, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, South AfricaEwert P.J. Kleynhans, School of Economics, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, South Africa
Abstract
Research purpose: This paper identified the university-sector links by applying a bill-of-goods approach to identify which sectors benefit as a result of an operational university campus.
Motivation for the study: The findings of this study will be used in refining provincial or local social accounting matrix (SAM) models to improve the measurement of an economic impact assessment for the university campus, especially as SAM models are not readily available on such a micro-level within South Africa.
Research design, approach and method: The bill-of-goods is a detailed representation of the purchases of goods and services for the campus. The goods and services are grouped into the corresponding sector according to the Standard Industrial Classification to identify and quantify university-sector linkages.
Main findings: The results indicated a significant benefit for tertiary sectors of the economy, which receive approximately 85% of university expenditure. On a sectoral level, there is an increased benefit to the utility, retail and personal services sectors, whereas manufacturing and construction turn out to be less significant. Growth prospects for sectors within the tertiary sectors are higher compared to sectors in the primary and secondary sectors.
Practical and managerial implications: Understanding this link enables strategic spatial planning on the part of local government and will enable proactive land-use planning, based on the strength and growth prospects of each individual sector that benefits from university expenditure.
Contribution or value-add: This approach provided exceptional value in identifying the sectors that benefit and provide important trend analyses that will be combined with input–output models to improve the accuracy of measuring university impact assessment on a local level.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3507Total article views: 5229
Crossref Citations
1. Digital Campus – a future former investment in education for a sustainable society
Narcisa Roxana Moşteanu, S. Bourekkadi, J. Abouchabaka, O. Omari, K. Slimani
E3S Web of Conferences vol: 234 first page: 00029 year: 2021
doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202123400029
2. Understanding the Regional Engagement of Universities from a Stakeholders’ Perspective: The Case of the University of Thessaly, Greece
Maria Adamakou, Spyros Niavis, Dimitris Kallioras, George Petrakos
Sustainability vol: 13 issue: 19 first page: 10565 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/su131910565
3. University population expenditure and its impact on real estate demand: Evidence from South Africa
David Dyason
Development Southern Africa vol: 37 issue: 2 first page: 197 year: 2020
doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1557510
4. Economic impact assessment of a South African university campus: A case for promoting on-campus contact learning
David Dyason, Riaan Rossouw, Ewert P.J. Kleynhans
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 22 issue: 1 year: 2019
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v22i1.3153
5. USING INTERNET AND EDUTECH BECOME A PRIMARY NEED RATHER THAN A LUXURY - THE REALITY: A NEW SKILLED EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM - DIGITAL UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
Narcisa Roxana Mosteanu
International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies vol: 4 issue: 6 first page: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.29121/ijoest.v4.i6.2020.129