Original Research

The quadruple helix model of innovation for Industry 4.0

Rigard J. Steenkamp
Acta Commercii | Vol 19, No 1 | a820 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v19i1.820 | © 2019 Rigard J. Steenkamp | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 July 2019 | Published: 03 December 2019

About the author(s)

Rigard J. Steenkamp, Department of Operations Management, Faculty of Economic and Management Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: The identity of the emerging next industrial revolution is clarified by means of a quadruple helix model. It is revealed how the fourth industrial revolution (FIR), also referred to as Industry 4.0, is underpinned by schemas much more than cyber-physical systems, the internet of things, digitisation and automatic identification technologies such as chips, sensors and internet protocols.

Research purpose: The emotional hype surrounding the FIR and the uncertainty around its identity need clarification. The purpose was to provide balancing perspectives for understanding the primary movements, management theories and sub-revolutions underpinning the emerging FIR.

Motivation for the study: The rationale of the study is to bring more clarity in a collective model of multiple complex innovation concepts.

Research design, approach and method: The study design was qualitative exploration. This implied a sequential exploratory qualitative multi-method process to obtain (1) practical case narrative data (phase A) and (2) theoretical narrative data (phase B).

Main findings: The primary movements underpinning the FIR are (1) triple management theory (TMT), (2) upscaling agility, (3) university-business cooperation (UBC) and triple helix (TH) ecosystem partnerships and (4) epochal society.

Practical/managerial implications: The exponential organisation of the future will require agile leaders who must be geared for change and personal transformation to thrive in a time of endless innovation. This study provides management with valuable insights and clarification of the complexities of innovation into a synthesised quadruple helix model of innovation for the FIR.

Contribution/value-add: The contribution of the study is also generic in terms of its contemporary value, clarifying the FIR identity and to serve as a vantage point of reference for further research.


Keywords

triple helix; triple management theory; innovation; technology; quadruhelix; entrepreneurial university

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4300
Total article views: 5273

 

Crossref Citations

1. Examining the roles of universities in place-based industrial strategy: which characteristics drive knowledge creation in priority technologies?
Andrew Johnston, Peter Wells, Drew Woodhouse
Regional Studies  vol: 57  issue: 6  first page: 1084  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1956683

2. A hypothetical improvement of the quadruple helix model of innovation
Riaan Dirkse Van Schalkwyk, Rigard J. Steenkamp
Acta Commercii  vol: 22  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4102/ac.v22i1.1037

3. Integrating Industry 4.0 plans into regional innovation strategies
Dominique Lepore, Francesca Spigarelli
Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit  vol: 35  issue: 5  first page: 496  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1177/0269094220937452

4. Towards Sustainable Education 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges of Decentralized Learning with Web3 Technologies
Breno Duarte, Márcio Ferro, Mohamed Yassine Zarouk, Alan Silva, Márcio Martins, Fábio Paraguaçu
Sustainability  vol: 17  issue: 16  first page: 7448  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3390/su17167448

5. The interplay between green supply chain management practices and firm performance: does green technological innovation and institutional pressure matter?
Alexander Otchere Fianko, Daniel Etse, Meshach Awuah-Gyawu, Darlington Bright Yao Adanfo
Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption  vol: 2  issue: 1  first page: 471  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1108/JRPC-12-2024-0070

6. Sociotechnical service quality for students and academics at private higher education institutions in South Africa
Riaan Dirkse van Schalkwyk, Jeanette Maritz, Rigard J. Steenkamp
Quality in Higher Education  vol: 27  issue: 1  first page: 77  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1080/13538322.2020.1815284

7. Government Support for Universities: Regional Coverage
V. L. Parkacheva, I. B. Trostyanskaya, E. G. Grishakina, N. A. Polikhina
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia  vol: 31  issue: 6  first page: 9  year: 2022  
doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-6-9-26

8. Managing a high-tech startup: A case of machine vision for the poultry industry
Kirill Simonov, Natalia Girfanova
Upravlenets  vol: 14  issue: 2  first page: 47  year: 2023  
doi: 10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-2-4

9. Evolution of Innovative Quintuple Helix Model for the Example of Industrial and Natural Parks in Ukraine
Mykola Petrushenko
Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine  issue: 1(38)  first page: 109  year: 2020  
doi: 10.37405/1729-7206.2020.1(38).109-115

10. Regional Digital Resilience and the 4Helix Model—The Higher Education Institutions’ Case in Romania
Adriana Grigorescu, Cristina Lincaru, Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, Speranța Pîrciog
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research  vol: 18  issue: 2  first page: 928  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3390/jtaer18020048

11. The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: implementation of triple helix model relations
Assefa Tesfaye Hailu
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship  vol: 13  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1186/s13731-024-00370-y

12. Exploring Managerial Innovation in the University Context: an In-Depth Look through a Systematic Literature Review
Hanae Amrani , Zouheir Boussouf , AHMED AFTISS
Data and Metadata  vol: 4  first page: 394  year: 2025  
doi: 10.56294/dm2025394